Sudden and unforeseen electrical or mechanical failure of plant in operation, at rest or during cleaning and overhaul. This is the gap a fire policy leaves open: a motor that burns out from an internal electrical fault is not a fire loss, and is not covered by the fire policy that most plants assume protects their machinery.
Internal electrical and mechanical failure
The gap the standard fire policy leaves open
Extension for damage caused to nearby assets
Third-party and own-property extensions available
A fire policy pays when a machine burns. It does not pay when a machine simply fails. This is the cover for electrical and mechanical failure of plant in operation.
This is the cover where a machine's age changes what is available rather than only what it costs. Beyond a certain age insurers restrict cover, apply higher excesses or decline the item outright, and the threshold differs between them. An itemised schedule with the year of manufacture against each machine is therefore the first thing we ask for, because a schedule that says only a total value cannot be placed properly.
The second thing that decides a claim is the sum insured basis. Reinstatement means what it would cost to buy that machine today, landed and erected, not the depreciated book value carried in the accounts. A schedule built from the fixed asset register almost always understates it, and the shortfall is applied proportionately to the claim.
Where a single machine is the plant, the loss of profit extension is worth more than the material damage section. A press or a furnace that takes four months to replace stops the factory for four months whether or not the repair bill is paid promptly.
Powered by Raksha AI · General information only, not financial advice.