Cover for the gross profit a business stops earning while it rebuilds after an insured material damage loss. The fire policy pays for the shed; this pays for the months the shed is not producing. Written on a gross-profit basis with an indemnity period chosen to match how long the business would actually take to return to its prior trading position.
Turnover lost less the costs that stop with it
Chosen to match real rebuild and recovery time
Extra spend to keep trading during recovery
Cover responds only if the damage claim is admitted
The fire policy rebuilds the shed. This answers for the months the shed is not producing, which is usually the larger loss.
It is the item most often set too short, and the reason is that people cost the rebuild rather than the recovery. Twelve months is chosen because a shed takes about a year to put back up. But the loss does not end when the roof goes on: there is approval, procurement lead time on plant, commissioning, and then the work of winning back customers who went elsewhere while you were shut.
For a business with imported machinery on a long delivery, or one selling into contracts that are re-tendered annually, twelve months can be less than half of what is needed. We size the period against how the business would actually come back, and we would rather argue for a longer period at placement than explain a shortfall afterwards.
The second recurring error is the gross profit definition. Using the accounting figure rather than the insurance one understates the sum insured, and an understated sum insured on this cover is reduced proportionately in the same way an under-insured building is.
Powered by Raksha AI · General information only, not financial advice.